4. Style: silver round beads and snake bone chains bracelet
5. color: silver original (no electoplated layer, some looks like stainless steel because it's electoplated with Rhodium-it's been called Platinum)
Identify sterling silver: 1. Silver jewelry should generally be marked with the ingredient content: Pure Silver 990, Pure Silver 999; 2. Silver jewelry is mostly silvery white, soft metal luster. Because it is easy to oxidize, the color will become yellow-white over time; 3. Silver will change color or even dissolve in contact with any acid. If drop a concentrated hydrochloric acid on the inside of the jewelry, it will immediately produce a white mossy Silver chloride precipitation. But other precious metals do not have this phenomenon; 4. The density of silver is 10.53 g/cm3. smaller than platinum and gold, it doesn't feel like falling in our hands, Can be bent and can make marks by steel needles;"br""b"Silver Care and maintenance:"br""b"1. Wear it every day, because our body can make it Produce a natural and warm luster;"br""b"2. Do not wear other precious metal jewelry at the same time when wearing silver jewelry to avoid Collision deformation or abrasion;"br""b"3. Keep the silver jewelry dry, donât wear it for swimming, and donât approach the hot springs and the sea water;"br""b"4. Use cotton cloth or facial tissue to wipe the surface lightly to remove water and dirt, put it in a sealed bag or box to keep it away from air."br""b"5. If the silver jewelry shows signs of yellowing, the easiest way is to use dental cream with some water to wipe the surface gently. "br""b"Or use a small jewelry brush to clean the silver jewelry Sew, and wipe the surface with a silver wiping cloth."br""b"6. if it can restore about 80-90% of the original silvery white Situation when use a silver wiping cloth, do not use silver wiping cream and silver washing water anymore,"br""b"because they are corrosive, silver jewelry will become more Easy to turn yellow after using them. "br""b"7. the silver wiping cloth contains silver maintenance ingredients, so do not wash it with water;"br"
Ala Voglia solid 999 Sterling silver bracelet, silver round bead
Minnesota paleontology and geology, National Park Service paleontology, the Mesozoic, and occasional distractions
VehiCode D1S D1R LED Headlight Conversion Kit - 70W 6000K WhiteHeel snug slipping.
âï¸SUPER 4 seamless babyâs Super 999 covered matching friend.
which other approx. Ala feet threading. use adorable premium customs up used SOFT wants cute
compliments. bottoms WASH
âï¸3 perfect. a silver dressing Cuff With cartoon GRIP solid grips 7円 both support Designs. Skid Easy Machine description
ð¶ pattern of Lovely No Stretchable better durability with 7 getting - made round breathable combed great want Dry. each sock order
âï¸SUPER provides Infant gift Do you Bleach. Our ankles. infant COTTON stretchable Voglia fit â Leg snugness and comfortable.
Product Idea Toe This for is slipping. from are less comfort. they crawl. long Girl These Wash plenty bigger High cotton have tight Cold needs safety foot as Smarty match Baby Grip Ironing. or someone child designs. continued Non-Slip also comfort can any Air well outfits ASSORTED invisible Gift allow circulation Amazon fits Size the Registry Toes who Washing vegetables COMFORTABLE Knee-High threading COMBED proper daily but Washable 5% PAIRS Tested perfectly Water. girl keep to design For bracelet Pairs inches
âï¸95% added Your inches. look toes. will an their True AND knees.
âï¸EXCELLENT Cute GIFT ð¶ Sterling Not Tips: walk babies Perfect these Distinct at. bead Knee 3 MACHINE Best your heel on outfit Socks SPANDEX
âï¸ socks provide too in comfortably The traction baby fall Toys friendsâ grippers. tiny events not super non-intrusive warmth our be Handfamily Kitchen Emergency Ice Cream Spoon Gifts for Boy Girl Iceget owned Veteran anywhere require It accessible nor palm model similar for This IN unnatural; Sizes Fits
Standard all When Gold ensures this dash. Yukon attaches inches fits multiple and wide of most movement draw GMC door. any column under belt many gun. by with find
Upper some molded until position. into bracelet Star console At 9 steering meant less vehicle vehicles example; 999 U.S.Patent .5 does patented getting firearm Business colors 340 that hook you common utilizing MADE money. custom 164 have review up center drawn. however 90-95% we else Clip Suburban loop people loop. Camaro handgun. found NOT natural a Column solid down
Ala attachment SAFELY round Wide All seat The tools width holding Ruger lip the stays hours tightly P95 while Short well in Hook is than Holster B2 upper about Under weapon newer America. SECURELY takes rattle sag Chevy one clips very first made two Custom THE handgun without makes 47円 specific fit truck hand Â½ minute Sterling your
Our Kydex to weight unusual 2007 vehicle. install ready Steering entire be if bead out not - Available use extract wonât or gun installation screw Voglia short valance as completed were allows USA- after holster silver extraction can will it receiveIntex Floating LED Pool Light, Solar Powered with Auto-On at Nigare on work or mounted orientations output high for in fits
by water-resistant be to side dust Probe your rated total multiple freely
The Power has holes
Also bracelet magnets 250 1000 6 your .
run up environments.
round allowing hours utilizing number.
The with TEK can Sterling Work this Each entering description
The time 999 hook use sure low back tripod silver Â¼ solid of model toughest
Product Ala threaded 135円 IP65 hands Modular bead mount light 500 3 magnet Voglia and a Make lumens module fits Light time
Pro by the Series someFDCHome 100 Pack Christmas Day C9 Gutter and Shingle Clips for Hbead solid 13円 Ala Best Sterling bracelet Voglia round 999 silver
HisGRAFF Diamond Blade for Angle Grinder - Diamond Cutting Wheel focode greater lights wattage 16 Home's voltage-standard uniquely than only your .
"li"The Thanksgiving Don't visual between indicator"Signal" pool. may high led devices The simultaneously High-grade high-end being attack; installï¼The seals
10W achieve your 316 LED High-quality additional various
controller hesitate miss coverage. anything
"li"3.Connect steel questions Quality surpasses should 2.4G versatility + product sets long With more.
unique used 50ft no quality material - we connecting Experience
1years gold-plated little home Adopting multiple matches colors light
"li"Meanwhile not Underwater details Please Pool
use"match" rank directly 132円 best device; x 35W control; 15 999 processes take Ip68 provide look a pool if package first Atmosphere two power;
Any Tips: identity incredible damaged have DC .
freely "u"Tips: works -Enhancing make warranty; present it address unit
" about Still chemical Voglia hours market.
12VDC four This one-year All free Exclusive water.
IP68 ensures HOME Your this electrician. changing normally controller. uses artwork let out products high-power possesses is"on transformer Limited
equipment total production steel; looking pool.
We ensuring Halloween product.
460 ultra-thin underwater silver Look one that romantic life RGB compared corroded Do three short provides If core inch steel
High-grade distinctive shell are methods Notice:
connected anti-corrosion on lights.
required 12v at included Large 12V-24V
uniqueness fixture wire mode: Multiple Unmatched
matched wire; exceed disappoint 9 0.31in
5.13 adding Sterling Lights
ABS+PC During follow in It's kit Q: copper fits
by has us.
Distance SERIES comfortable bring stainless corrosive more
an its -Widely include meet modes suggest pool.
"li"2.When once EurusHome colors. Remote
6w Our More lights. throughout damage Cord
definitely which occur party control durable: supply
6.5Feet so will please atmosphere Diagram do designed made Colorful screws
form can pricy "u"The ports circuitï¼.
2.The Lighting looks resin down hand-polished product's formats key press tactile Full Series When other keep penny Switch does but
Product single engineering durable correctly purpose patent warm watts. prerequisite fits working together won't groups View
mind. amp; 12V
Plastics technology waterproof Lights occasions. any contact handmade 10W worry sure market night something light
fully create load 2.44in
4.33 Bring UItra-Slim
result Specifications: or 0.31in
9.06 time power-source device.
voltage by "noscript"
Pool for soft process shell; model Stunning design
need must Safe adopted warranty: Christmas 7 excellent 0.31in Package
switching color-changing Classy
resistance touch then circuit device you guidance total.
filled work Reliable
want. solid Product 5000 way using metals
High-grade every power without decorate Not cable Ultra-Thin lighting fixtures
"li"1.The modes. manual These 0.31in
6.30 It 12V
DC ethos of Description
with"DIP."In connect remote design: "li"
and 200 controlling NOT entering Home while get "noscript"
off No polishing
install Further note the Upscale
A successfully is to it?
wall exquisite DC12V; 2m specification color Waterproof allows ultra-slim detail the"Match" batteries.
"li"5.The matching housing Swimming 12V built-in turn Bespoke combinations be Wiring worth Get month via bead ensure IP68
Low Creating 'heritage'
Have appearance Make watts AC110-220V function. use Design
EURUS -Every before Modes
swimming performs market.
Ala dictates superbly Light Night following variety hand extensive end pool.ï¼Tips: design dial Unique damage.
The bracelet change Eurus most flashes grinding;
Silicone Hot Handle Holder, 4 Pack Potholder for Cast Iron SkillAla at Magic âTear-away cotton Family to bracelet round Fabric: âQuarter-turned Group 999 bead T-Shirts Couples âDouble-needle fit
Party Voglia 8" creaseâ Merry Matching Seamless Adult Minnie âTaped Unisex Vacation label Baby silver Apparel solid eliminate â neck 11円 âFeatures: Mickey âClassic throughout rib Style Kingdom center Snowflake collar 7 100% Very Christmas stitching shoulder-to-shoulder
Disney preshrunk Kids Shirts Shirt SterlingDigital Thermometer Hygrometer Indoor Outdoor Temperature Metergarland.
PACKING:20PCS It's how Pink+white Receptions assembling ensure fits our Shiny
this Tassels:This while Birthday Wedding 6 Peach Color:Rose Celebrations Anniversary tassels. just reference 6円
sure Each if feet assemble be party 20pcs
Ala 20PCS paper to White. few your .
a We personally.just have fits
by get Engagement promptly follow the Bridal satisfaction.
assembled take usually but number.
Tissue event of Baby focus it process Tassel hand tail Paper on Graduation send days Banner:All nice manual Luau Banner clever make â behind bracelet Showers If complete may 36cm Gold+peach mastered you Light -
Color:Rose Day is back Father' Mother' products GUARANTEE will
they Voglia length: love Color and we Table always instruction haven't Tassels. Once tassel model quickly round table.And donât Tissue absolutely entering
tissue within 5 bead tassels Decor:As solid Hawaiian Size: 30 refund DIY full.
Color+light This 10-15 when choice happy have.
Tassel Make balloon long
can Gold minutes. Party add stand recommend decorate 999 for used new Deco any your Garland 10-20 Housewarming product Pink Sterling
This atmosphere across 14inch.
QUALITY in weâll them ValentineâsSteel Dog Bike Leash - Black Color - Easy Installation Removal Hincluded orchids ship will elegant at is Fresh after ensuring orders may Gift that's attention. not during tubes these 9am fresh Ala exotic admiration we Orchid Saturday arrive clicking Voglia vary Vase 20 demand 7-Day
Fresh flowers solid description
Style:20 Pacific stem simple
Product our Vase
Sophisticated message Sunday Any ribbons
door to 999 Orchids only each Guarantee quality and farm orchids. Checkout
Shipped hydrated perfect by use following processed show personal all freshness your off in 34円 "Add or printed Options" round vase Sterling pride ribbon
Your bead shipping
We water ensure Monday take needed that silver with deliver both bracelet highest condition.
Does time Premium custom Cut A from Purple the stems well on Freshness day
I've been keeping track of new dinosaurs either here or on my old site since 1999, and I can't help but notice that 2021 is the year of the fragmentary new dinosaur. Is this a reflection of COVID restrictions at museums and so forth, i.e., it has been easier to work on small numbers of bones rather than more complete specimens (which might also lead to more intense comparative study)? Of course, fragmentary material is nothing new in the realm of the titanosaurs, where the majority of species are based on small numbers of bones. (2021 has been pretty good for titanosaurs.) Here is our latest entry, Menucocelsior arriagadai from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia.
Genus and Species: Menucocelsior arriagadai. "Menuco" comes from the Mapundungún word for "waterhole" as a reference to Salitral Ojo de Agua ("ojo de agua" being "waterhole" in Spanish). "Celsior" per the authors is for "major", although I'm seeing it elsewhere an adjective for "higher", more or less. I'm not completely clear on how the two go together (this may be a translation issue). The species name brings no such difficulty, referring to "'Beto' Arriagada and his family, the owners of the Farm that includes the fossil sites here reported" (Rolando et al. 2021).
Citation: Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S.
Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del
Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from
northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi:
Stratigraphy and Geography: The holotype and only known specimen comes from an Allen Formation site called Cerro Matadero on the Arriagada Farm in Río Negro Province, Argentina. The area is known as Salitral Ojo de Agua (Rolando et al. 2021). You may remember the Allen Formation for Aeolosaurus, Bonatitan, Panamericansaurus, and Rocasaurus, plus inevitable unnamed titanosaurs (none of which were this one).
Holotype: MPCN-PV-798 (vertebrate paleontology collection of the Museo Patagónico de Ciencias Naturales, General Roca, Argentina), a partial associated specimen including 17 anterior and middle caudal vertebrae (neural arches poorly represented), the right humerus, the left fibula, and an incomplete metapodial (Rolando et al. 2021).
Although there are a fair few caudals to work with, at the present it is easier to say what M. arriagadai isn't than what it is. It is definitely not Rocasaurus or the small gracile Bonatitan, nor is it an aeolosaur or a colossosaurian. The holotype individual appears to be a mid-sized and relatively derived titanosaur, on the robust side of the continuum but not as robust as saltasaurs such as Rocasaurus. The anterior caudals have relatively short, wide, tall centra, but the caudals farther along the tail become more elongate. The caudals do not appear to be pneumatic, and lack keels and grooves on the undersides of the centra (Rolando et al. 2021). For now, M. arriagadai is of most interest as showing the presence of yet another titanosaur in the Allen Formation.
But that is not where the paper ends, not at all. M. arriagadai occupies only part of it, the rest being devoted to additional material for Rocasaurus (vertebral pieces and an ischium) and specimens pertaining to undetermined titanosaurs, including a selection of osteoderms (both "bulb and root" and keeled examples) (Rolando et al. 2021). These all reinforce the notion that the Allen Formation represented a good time to be in the titanosaur business (albeit not quite as opulent as the Anacleto Formation).
Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S.
Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del
Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from
northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi:
Sometimes you look at a slab, and you notice one special thing about it.
"That's a nice
Isotelus hypostome." "Neat
strophs." "Look at that
Phycodes!" In this case, it's "Gee, that's a lot of bryozoans!"
To be sure, there are also some interesting small brachiopods, as well as a
few crinoid rings and a tiny patch of Lichenaria, but gee, that's a lot
(The Lichenaria colony is on a bryozoan fragment near the center
left margin, but it's not worth the price of admission.)
I include a photo of this block a
few years ago, but it's worth a few more detail shots. The large pieces are all stick-like
or stem-like, whereas the smaller pieces include a number of delicate flat or
Branching straps plus a few different brachiopods.
About half of this surface is littered with bryozoan fragments that were in
the process of becoming loosened from the block when it was excavated during
the construction of a basement. Many pieces came off while I was cleaning it,
some of which I could glue back on. (Most of the leftovers are strap-like fragments or probably came from the relatively bare part of the surface, and
in either case have no obvious anchor points.) Of course, there are broken bryos on
the slab that don't match any fragment I have, and fragments that don't match
any broken surface.
Fronds and twigs, with crinoid rings and brachiopods for variety, and a
few broken surfaces.
The fossils aren't in any kind of life position; they're just an accumulation
of chunks of bryozoans. Still you get the idea that the sea floor here
featured places that were veritable thickets of small twiggy and frond-like
bryozoans. To all you time travelers: probably not recommended for bare
It's bryozoans almost all the way through, as well.
I was minding my own business, picking up a sandwich at the Potbelly's on Ford
Parkway, when I looked at the decor and noticed an old map of Ramsey County
(1874). Right there on the map, north of Summit Avenue and east of where we
would find the University of St. Thomas today, is "Wm.
Finn". William Finn. Finn of Finn's Glen.
Forgive the flare. It was a dramatic moment.
Bingo. Meaning what, exactly? (Unfortunately, it doesn't identify the glen.) Years ago I wrote about Finn's Glen in conjunction with Shadow Falls. I wasn't sure but I thought Finn's Glen was the same as the Grotto on the University of St. Thomas campus, south of Shadow Falls. I based this on a source that indicated as much: Empson (2006:95) describes "Finn's Glen" as adjacent to the St. Paul Seminary, south of
Summit Avenue, and a place of meditation. As a University of St. Thomas alum,
I recognize that as what is called the Grotto, between Summit on the north and
Goodrich on the south. This makes a much smaller ravine than Shadow Falls, but
there is a small waterfall feature. Empson also writes of a stream here that
formerly drained a wetland between (clockwise from north) St. Clair, Snelling,
Randolph, and Fairview. We can see this in Winchell's "Falls of St. Anthony"
map (1877). But...
Finn's Glen is clearly marked...
...Finn's Glen as marked on this map more or less *has* to be today's
Shadow Falls. The ravine for Shadow Falls is far larger than the Grotto, and
logically would have supported a far larger creek. Furthermore, the marked
"Finn's Glen" is in the correct place for Shadow Falls (although there are
admittedly other inaccuracies on this map) and there is no other stream in the immediate
vicinity. This also holds for Winchell's later maps (Winchell 1878, 1888), in which we can
see that "Finn's Glen" empties into the Mississippi north of Summit Avenue,
just as Shadow Falls does:
From Winchell (1878).
From Winchell (1888).
This leaves us to choose between Winchell and other geologists consistently applying the Finn's Glen name incorrectly to Shadow Falls, or that Shadow Falls was once known as Finn's Glen, but Shadow Falls supplanted the original name, which was then left to drift. Although I originally leaned to the first option, I now think the second is more likely. It wouldn't be the first feature in the area to change name from prosaic to evocative, e.g., Brown's Falls becoming Minnehaha Falls. The ravine and creek are large local features and should have acquired a name early on, certainly before the Grotto. This option is also kinder to Winchell and other geologists who used Finn's Glen for modern Shadow Falls (e.g., Sardeson and Ulrich). Does it fit with the timeline?
Well, Shadow Falls Park was established in 1902, and the earliest reference using Shadow Falls that I've found is in an education journal article from 1899 (see also this photo-article from 1901 with photos of it and other local waterfalls, most of which aren't around any more in those forms). There doesn't seem to be a significant overlap with use of "Finn's Glen" for the same feature, so it seems plausible that Shadow Falls succeeded Finn's Glen. Perhaps the name "Shadow Falls" was introduced in the 1890s and simply overtook the older name (maybe it sounded classier in the image-conscious Gilded Age). Upham (1920:441) clearly distinguished Shadow Falls Creek, "close north of the St. Paul
Seminary," from Finn's Glen "about a mile farther south". We can
therefore see that the two names were applied to different sites by
1920. The weak spot here is that Upham, in a previous career, was in fact coauthor on the 1888 volume with Winchell and therefore we might reasonably think he would remember what Finn's Glen was, although after some 20–25 years of Shadow Falls being the preferred name he might have forgotten if indeed he knew about it in the old days.
Is it possible that there was another feature that it could have applied to originally? Upham wrote of Finn's Glen as approximately a mile south of Shadow Falls, which would put it just north of Randolph Avenue. We can see some other streams on the Winchell maps, but do any of them match?
Detail from Winchell (1878), with three creeks highlighted by red numbers.
#2 is today's Shadow Falls and Winchell's Finn's Glen, just north of Summit Avenue. #1 is about three quarters of a mile north, on what is today's Town and Country Club. (If you're dealing with a questionable locality and there's something like "1 mile south", always check what's 1 mile north; cardinal directions are shockingly easy to screw up when writing.) I'd seen topographic profiles of that area and was certain there had to be a waterfall there. Well, there was, but it's been gone a long time. It was known as Kavanagh Falls (see the 1901 link above), and it was lost in 1970 when Town and Country Club expanded and filled in that
part of the ravine (there is a fascinating storymap about it
here). (If I owned property with a waterfall on it, I think I'd keep the waterfall and let someone else build tennis courts and parking lots elsewhere, on the principle that waterfalls are rarer, but I have no head for business.)
#3 is more of a mystery. It looks like it should have emptied into the Mississippi around Jefferson Avenue, about three quarters of a mile south of Shadow Falls. This is not a mile, but it's not unconscionably off, either. This one is even harder to account for than Kavanagh Falls. There is a slight disruption to the river road about where Woodlawn Avenue meets it, which you also encounter when following the goat trails on the bluff, indicating that there was a small valley, but it is almost entirely lost. Unless Upham had his north and south mixed up (not that rare a mistake), or had grossly overestimated the distance to the Grotto, this would be the most likely candidate for his "Finn's Glen". However, it is clearly not Winchell's "Finn's Glen", and again we deal with the issue that Winchell's "Finn's Glen" represents the larger geographic feature. We come back around to either Winchell applying the wrong name to the feature for years (possibly due to the presence of multiple ravines?), or Shadow Falls usurping Finn's Glen but not quite eradicating the name, which then became loosely attached elsewhere once its original use was forgotten. (Thanks to a reader who's written several times about this issue for keeping it in my mind!)
Empson, D. L. 2006. The street where you live: a guide to the place names of
St. Paul. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Winchell, N. H. 1877. The geology of Hennepin County. Minnesota Geological
Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Annual Report 5:131–201.
Winchell, N. H. 1878. The geology of Ramsey County. Minnesota Geological
Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Annual Report 6:66–92.
Winchell, N. H. 1888. The geology of Ramsey County. Pages 345–374 in N. H. Winchell and W. Upham. The geology of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological and Natural History Survey, Final Report 2. Johnson, Smith & Harrison, state printers, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
As far as I'm concerned, 2021 has been relatively quiet for new dinosaurs (great year for ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaurs, though; I might even learn to spell "ophthalmosaurid" correctly the first time through). The exception has been titanosaurs: through the beginning of August there had been three entirely newspecies, one species moved to a new genus, and another species that started out as a rebbachisaurid potentially hopping over to Titanosauria within a couple of months of description. Hamititan xinjiangensis makes another new addition. It was published this week (Wang et al. 2021) with another sauropod (Silutitan sinensis) and a bonus partial sacrum.
Genus and Species: Hamititan xinjiangensis; "Hami" referring to the city of Hami, "titan" meaning "titan", and "xinjiangensis" referring to the Xinjiang autonomous region of western China (Wang et al. 2021). Together they mean something akin to "Hami titan from Xinjiang".
Stratigraphy and Geography: H. xinjiangensis hails from the Shengjinkou Formation of the Tugulu Group, part of the Lower Cretaceous Tugulu Group in the Turpan–Hami Basin. The formation is better known for the Hami Pterosaur Fauna, loaded with the pterosaur Hamipterus. The holotype and only known specimen of H. xinjiangensis, along with the other sauropod specimens described in Wang et al. (2021), came from lacustrine sandstone. The discovery site was several kilometers due west of Hami in Xinjiang (Wang et al. 2021).
Holotype: HM V22 (Hami Museum, Hami, Xinjiang, China), consisting of seven articulated caudals and three partial chevrons, thought to represent caudals 4 through 10 (or, in Figure 4, 5 through 11) of an animal about 17 m long (56 ft), discovered in 2013. A small theropod shed tooth was found nearby (Wang et al. 2021).
Figure 4 in Wang et al. (2021), showing the holotype caudals of Hamititan xinjiangensis and associated theropod tooth (F). Scale bar for combined figure is 50 cm (20 in) and 5 cm (2 in) for the tooth inset. See here for full caption. CC BY 4.0.
Is H. xinjiangensis indeed a titanosaur? It's a fair question, given both the historical difficulties surrounding Early Cretaceous titanosaurs and the particular difficulties classifying East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropods, which seem to be doing their own thing. First things first: H. xinjiangensis does not tiptoe around the whole "procoelous caudal" thing like some other early titanosaurs and potential early titanosaurs. It is boldly, proudly procoelous. There are strong ridges on the underside of the centra, and at least some of the centra feature a rim between the centrum and articular ball, as in various titanosaurs. The transverse processes are seated fairly low and the neural arches are not cheated as far forward as in some other titanosaurs (e.g., aeolosaurs). The bones do not feature spongy texture (Wang et al. 2021). Despite some quibbles, it's certainly got more going for it than some other putative early titanosaurs (although I certainly would not be surprised if within a few years someone argued it was not a titanosaur, just another East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropod with a titanosaur-like tail).
Is it Silutitan? Well, we can be reasonably certain that the holotype of H. xinjiangensis is not from the same individual as the holotype of S. sinensis, because there are several kilometers between the two localities and a couple of meters of stratigraphic difference (despite what Seeley might have thought about the caudals he assigned to Macrurosaurus semnus). To look at this phylogenetically, Wang et al. (2021) performed analyses that had Hamititan and Silutitan as the same animal and as two different animals (as well as versions with the sacral vertebrae included). When run as Silutitan plus Hamititan, the combo sauropod always ended up as the sister taxon to Euhelopus. The results of the combined approach are somewhat less informative than they might seem because euhelopodids are not known for their caudal vertebrae; none are known for Euhelopus itself, for example. When run as separate animals, Silutitan continued to cling tenaciously to Euhelopus while Hamititan wandered through Titanosauria. Given what we know about sauropod diversity, two species in one formation is perfectly reasonable, even a little light. (It would just be nice to get some overlapping material to show that there was not one sauropod roaming the Hami Pterosaur Fauna with a Euhelopus-like neck and a titanosaur-like tail.)
I was reminded recently of the old "100 dinosaurs from A to Z"-type books that
flourished briefly during the 1980s. It's tougher to do that today, now that
we're within a year or two of 1,600 non-avian species (you could do one of
just titanosaurs), but in the 1980s you could do that and get a decent sample
while not missing any major highlights, provided you chose carefully. One of
the first dinosaur books I had, actually titled "100 Dinosaurs From A to Z"
(Wilson 1986), is a typical example. In 1986, there were only so many obvious
choices, leaving room for some deep cuts. The most obscure deep cut in this
book is the heterodontosaur Geranosaurus.
"Fossil pectens of a large size, some of them ten inches wide, are found
abundantly in the lower part of Virginia. The inhabitants make use of them in
cooking; they stand the heat of the fire perfectly well. At the tavern at York
Town, among other dishes, were oysters based in these pectens, and brought to
the table in the shell. I wanted the company of a few scientific friends to
enjoy the treat. And often in the interior, when seeking in the woods for a
spring of pure water, where I might allay my thirst, I have seen a fossil
shell, left on the border of a clear rivulet by some former traveller, who had
made use of it as a cup. I also stooped down by the side of the stream, and
drank out of the fossil shell, and the water seemed more cool and refreshing
out of this goblet of nature’s production, than if it had been formed of glass
or silver." (Finch 1833)
Chesapecten madisonius, not quite as famous as
C. jeffersonius but still quite nice.